User talk:Anuvarsh

Week 6 Feedback

I’ve chosen to issue partial feedback sooner than complete feedback later, in case it will help you address issues with Week 8.

Individual and shared work were both submitted on time.
Requisite links to and from the user page as well as page categories are all present.
Electronic notebook was maintained.
Work was submitted in appropriate frequencies with corresponding summaries.
This amounts to a “best practices” perfect score. Good work, keep it up!

Work in progress.

—Dondi (talk) 16:41, 25 October 2015 (PDT)

Work was submitted on time.
All good-habit items are fulfilled:
- All expected links and categories were noted.
- Electronic notebook content was seen.
- Summaries were consistently provided over a good number of edits.
For the exercises, the following issues were seen; all others were correct:
- Your final tagging command inadvertently inserts a space inside the terminator sequence.
- For your mRNA strand, the ts were not converted to us. That is not mRNA then, technically.
Shared responses were provided and they came in on time.

—Dondi (talk) 23:45, 4 October 2015 (PDT)

Work was submitted on time, with a few hours to spare. That is some decent wiggle room in case you experience unexpected delays.
All good-habit items are fulfilled:
- All expected links and categories were noted.
- The way you phased your work can use some improvement—7 submissions for 11 individual questions and 3 shared questions means that you wrote out multiple answers for some of your submitted edits—but at least you consistently supplied a change summary with all of them.
- You accompanied your work with electronic notes and processes.
All exercises were performed or answered correctly.
Thank you for your frank shared responses. It is heartening to see your passion and mindfulness toward bringing computer science and biology exposure to younger students, in the spirit of promoting better diversity at the university level. Don’t lose that energy :)

—Dondi (talk) 00:57, 26 September 2015 (PDT)

Although, the Week 2 scores have not yet been posted, I want to give you feedback on the assignment that you can incorporate to your your Week 3 submission.
First, thank you for submitting your assignment on time (by a day!).
Your translations are correct.
In terms of an electronic notebook, I see that you put in some general comments about the central dogma, etc. However, the notebook should be a document the process of what you did to arrive at the answers, not just some information about the answers. Please be sure to do this for your Week 3 submission.
You wrote something in the Summary field for 8/8 contributions between the Week 1 and Week 2 deadlines, keep up the good work! However, you completed the full assignment in only 3 edits to the wiki. This suggests that you are doing the work outside the wiki and then pasting it in. Ideally, you should do the work natively in the wiki environment. Even if this is not the case, you will want to consider saving your changes more frequently so that the granularity of the changes is smaller.
You completed all of the links requested via your template.
With regards to your comments on your shared journal entry, it is ironic that the shortest papers are often the hardest to understand!

— Kdahlquist (talk) 23:50, 20 September 2015 (PDT)

I answered your question on my user talk page.
Although the scores have not yet been posted, I want to provide feedback on your Week 1 assignment.
Thank you for submitting your work on time.
Your assignment is neat and complete, except for the following:
1. You did not list your career interests and goals.
2. Please spell out what TDD means as not everyone will know that acronym.
3. You wrote something in the Summary field for 19 out of 21 contributions, or 90% of the time, which is excellent. However, we are striving for 100% of the time; don't forget to write something when you upload a file.
4. You go from two == to four ==== in your headers, skipping three ===, so you only have two levels (we don't count the single =). Please reorganize to have ==, ===, and ====.
5. You should put the category on your template instead of just on the page so it will be there when you invoke your template on future assignments.

— Kdahlquist (talk) 00:02, 10 September 2015 (PDT)

I’ve answered your question on my talk page.

—Dondi (talk) 23:02, 11 September 2015 (PDT)