Difference between revisions of "Some Topics to Consider When Critiquing Talks"

From LMU BioDB 2013
Jump to: navigation, search
(Visuals: added clarifier "slides" to header)
(Content: modified based on oral communications rubric)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
== Content ==
 
== Content ==
  
* Message stated
+
* Central message is compelling (precisely stated, appropriately repeated, memorable, and strongly supported.)
* Message clear
+
* Clear explanations
+
* Selection of information
+
* Amount of material
+
* Slow beginning
+
 
* Good science  
 
* Good science  
* Balanced presentation
+
* Clear explanations
* Sufficient background and definitions
+
* Appropriate selection of information
 +
* Appropriate amount of material for the length of the talk
 +
* Slow beginning with sufficient background and definitions to understand the talk
  
 
== Organization ==
 
== Organization ==

Revision as of 19:11, 18 September 2013

Contents

Overall

In general, was the talk Excellent? Very Good? Good? Fair? Poor?

Content

  • Central message is compelling (precisely stated, appropriately repeated, memorable, and strongly supported.)
  • Good science
  • Clear explanations
  • Appropriate selection of information
  • Appropriate amount of material for the length of the talk
  • Slow beginning with sufficient background and definitions to understand the talk

Organization

  • Logical flow
  • Clear
  • 3-part framework (“Tell them what you’re going to say; say it; tell them what you said”)
  • Outline (given, followed)
  • Parallel form used as needed

Visuals (Slides)

  • Visible
  • Simple
  • Emphasis on important information
  • Selection
  • Number (not too many)
  • Variety

Speaking Style (Language and Delivery)

  • Audience contact and awareness
  • Eye contact
  • Attitude (friendly, calm, enthusiastic, …)
  • Emphasis on important information
  • Knowledgeable
  • Answered questions well
  • Use of pointer (not circling)
  • Voice (loud, soft, monotonous)
  • Accent, enunciation
  • Pace
  • Talking (not memorizing)
  • Well-prepared
  • Well-practiced
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox